Mostly philosophical topics, especially pertaining to the philosophy of mind and whether an afterlife makes sense.
Thursday 22 March 2018
Underdetermination of Scientific Theory
How do we make sense of change in the world? We need to dream up a theory that explains what we see. We can understand why the black dots move in the way they do if we hypothesize that the dots reside on the apexes of invisible moving equilateral triangles. We might not be able to perceive the triangles, perhaps not even in principle, but we can confidently infer their existence.
But wait!
The movement of the black dots is equally explicable if we imagine the dots reside at the apexes of invisible moving squares. Or, if they are moving along the lines constituting a star shape. If we are unable, perhaps even in principle, of perceiving any of these shapes, then how could we know which theory is correct? Indeed, perhaps none of them are?
Likewise, change in our world is accounted for by the existence and interactions of subatomic particles. We cannot see these particles, not even in principle, but we can infer their existence, just as we can infer triangles for the movement of the black dots. So, does this mean that what we see with our naked eyes could appeal to quite different entities to explain what we see? I think so.
This is a problem in science since all possible evidence we could have radically underdetermines which theory is the correct one. This is called the underdetermination of scientific theory by evidence. It also invites the question of whether our theories that utilize entities that can never be directly observed, actually depict a literal state of affairs.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Ralph Lewis's Arguments against an Afterlife
I read an article by Ralph Lewis M.D entitled: Is There Life After Death? The Mind-Body Problem He attacks any possibility of an afterlife....
Popular Posts
-
Note: This response is approximately 13,000 words long. I have a shorter version of approximately 5,000 words that I have called A Review ...
-
1. Preliminary I recently finished reading The Soul Fallacy by Julien Musolino for the second time, and I thought I'd pen down some of...
-
1. Introduction Common sense holds that what has been labelled the secondary qualities , such as colours, sounds and odours, exist out there...
-
Steven Novella , an American clinical neurologist, is well-known in the skeptical community and is co-founder of the New England Skeptical S...
-
People ask what's the point of life, what's the point of the Universe, and even if there's an afterlife, what would be the point...
-
There's a new AI chatbot called ChatGPT that seems to be vastly superior in its responses to any other chatbot I have attempted to con...
-
1. Introduction I read this article a couple of weeks ago by a professor of philosophy called John G Messerly. He says: There has b...
-
Introduction: I read the following article: Why Parapsychological Claims Cannot Be True It says: The entire field [of parapsychol...
-
I read an article by Ralph Lewis M.D entitled: Is There Life After Death? The Mind-Body Problem He attacks any possibility of an afterlife....
-
Preamble The rally, or the last hurrah, which in recent years has been termed terminal lucidity , refers to where a person, typically suffer...